For Release Sunday, October 18, 2009
© 2009 Washington Post Writers Group
WASHINGTON — Last week the sleeping giant opened one eye. He even blinked the other.
For decades, the United States government has been shortchanging its own urban poverty pockets and taxing and spending in ways that encourage sprawl development. Even more, it’s ignored the plight of developing world cities and their exploding slum populations.
But a newly awakened American government was on display in Washington on October 5. The Obama administration reaffirmed its strong interest in the welfare of U.S. cities, especially more compact and sustainable communities. And it went a step further, offering a warm welcome to United Nations World Habitat Day–the first time, since its inception in 1986, the event been hosted in the United States.
Housing and Urban Development Secretary Shaun Dovovan was the official host. From the White House came such officials as Valerie Jarrett, close adviser to the president, and Melody Barnes, chair of the Domestic Policy Council. Susan Rice, U.S. Ambassador to the UN, appeared. So did top State Department officials Anne Marie Slaughter and Esther Brimmer, along with officials of the Environmental Protection Agency and others. Their constant theme: cities matter–seriously, at home and globally.
American diplomacy has had an historic, exclusive focus on nation states. No longer, said Slaughter: “We see cities as a problem for our diplomats,” especially in a world of rampant slum growth, restless youth populations and threatening climate change.
So what’s turned official Washington around? First, clearly, it’s Obama. As Donovan noted, the president “worked on the Southside of Chicago as a community organizer and walked the dirt paths of the Kibera slum of Nairobi as a Senator.”
But U.S. civil society has helped set the stage. The Rockefeller Foundation has opened a series of urban initiatives, domestic and foreign, pushed by its president, Judith Rodin. The Brookings Institution has pressed for progressive steps through its Metropolitan Policy Program (“a do tank within a think tank,” notes Rockefeller’s vice president, Darren Walker). Habitat for Humanity has targeted developing world cities’ land tenure issues. More non-profits, including the Washington-based International Housing Coalition, are focusing U.S. urban interests outward.
U.S. cities themselves helped start the transition–While the federal government slept, for example, they became concerned about global climate change. At latest count over 1,000 have signed onto the “Kyoto challenge, promising to meet the greenhouse gas emission goals that Congress never agreed to.
An agenda focused on world cities will face hurdles. Just as our own cities labored for decades under a negative image of urban riots and abandonment, developing world cities can easily be defined by their dilemmas of overwhelming population growth. The resulting slums, said UN Habitat executive director Anna Tibaijuka at the Washington sessions, “are the worst manifestation of urban poverty, deprivation, and exclusion in the modern world.”
Her point, underscored by others on World Habitat Day, is that cities are too central to the human future to be ignored. Cities simultaneously generate 70 percent of the world’s economic output and 80 percent of greenhouse gases. The United States’ own sustainability issues, ranging from antiquated infrastructure to deficient transportation systems to deficits of decent housing for the poor, are reflected in cities worldwide. Failing cities spell a meaner, more dangerous world.
This suggests that U.S. foreign aid programs should shift their major focus from rural areas, overwhelmingly favored in our dollars up to now, to cities–to help with slum upgrading, safe water for all, and advancing women’s rights. US-AID took a major step in that direction last week in announcing a new $1 billion, five-year program for clean water, electricity and other basic needs of the poor in the world’s 1,000 poor test cities.
Worldwide urbanization isn’t the evil–it’s the solution, William Cobbett, director of nonprofit Cities Alliance, insisted. Compared to rural life, cities are beacons of hope, the chance of productive employment for the masses. As the World Bank notes, no nation has ever achieved middle class status without urbanization.
That means nations–and American foreign aid programs–should actively assist, not fight, the tide of humanity flowing into the cities. But it should be shaped first and foremost to help people. There is often a problem of inefficient or corrupt local governments. U.S. aid should be consciously channeled to cities that are willing to respect the rights of the poor flowing in, to treat them as citizens, to make legal land tenure easier, to work constructively on housing and slum upgrading.
It’s a mistake, Cobbett argues, to ground our foreign assistance to cities on the basis of fear–fear of food emergencies, jobless youth and terrorism, for example. The more effective approach, he contends, is positive–the idea of building sustainable societies, new worlds of opportunity for urban peoples, both on our shores and around the world.
That, indeed, may be our central challenge as the giant of American officialdom wakens to the central role of cities in the struggle for a habitable and peaceful 21st century world. The globe’s conditions present lots to be frightened about. But fear, ultimately, doesn’t motivate. Hope and vision can.
Neal Peirce’s e-mail is npeirce@citistates.com.
For reprints of Neal Peirce’s column, please contact Washington Post Permissions, c/o PARS International Corp., WPPermissions@parsintl.com, fax 212-221-9195. For newspaper syndication sales, Washington Post Writers Group, 202-334-5375, wpwgsales@washpost.com.
3 Comments
I have no problem with helping to sort out the problems in the world’s cities. And I welcome the Obama administration’s new focus on place based policy.
But equally we need to see the crucial role of rural areas. Where are the essentials of life sourced? Where does food come from? Where is potable water sourced and foul water cleansed? Where is most renewable energy to be generated; and carbon to be locked up in forests?
Exploiting the natural resources of rural areas, sustainably, is another key to the world’s future. How will we get the innovation rural areas need if many of the more mobile, younger workers migrate to the cities?
We need a better understanding between urban and rural. In developing countries we need both decent cities and more productive agriculture, able to rely on better husbanded water resources. And our global future depends on conserving remaining rainforests and restoring those that have been damaged. These are crucial areas where developed countries can help with expertise and resources, if invited.
I’m not sure you mean to argue a focus on urban policy is “the solution” for world-migration trends as your commentary seems to suggest.
Isn’t it part of a comprehensive solution?
What happens if we ignore the plight of rural areas?
During a recent visit to rural Bristol, NH, I noticed a sign at the Walker family farm. It serves as a stark reminder: “No farm, no food.”
From Pamela Collett of HotSunFoundation.org:
I enjoyed your article about the promise, hope and opportunity of urban slums.
Before Obama’s visit, Hot Sun Films/Foundation was working in Kibera, east Africa’s largest slum, located in Nairobi, Kenya.
Hot Sun Films/Foundation was founded by filmmaker Nathan Collett, a Fulbright fellow, graduate of African Studies at Stanford University and MFA in film from the University of Southern California.
The goal of Hot Sun Films/Foundation is a Kibera Arts and Media Centre, where talented slum youth can receive training and produce quality films, providing opportunity, employment and inspiring the developing film industry in Kenya to look to slums for talent and stories.
We have had some success, especially with our short film KIBERA KID, which won seven international awards, including student Emmy 2007 for best children’s film. We have shown that talent exists in Kibera.
There is an added plus that was not mentioned in your article regarding slum life versus village life – tribal unity. In Kibera, youth of all tribes live, work, socialize together and inter-marry. They know each others’ languages, food, music and dance. In a village where almost everyone is of the same tribe and/or the “original” tribe bands together against “newcomers”, this does not usually happen. This does not mean there are never any tribal tensions, but they are in a different context.
We are in post-production of our feature film TOGETHERNESS SUPREME, an urban story of youth in Kibera who are working for peace and going beyond tribalism. We plan to take TOGETHERNESS SUPREME on the road around Kenya next year with youth from the slums to reach out to youth in the towns and villages, where there is talk of re-arming along tribal lines. We also want to take TOGETHERNESS SUPREME around the world, including the USA, to open peoples’ hearts and minds to the promise of urban slums like Kibera.