The Citistates Group presents

Las Vegas’ Dilemma: America’s, Only More So

Mark Muro / Oct 23 2009

For Release Friday, October 23, 2009
Citiwire.net

Mark MuroThe truism, of course, is that Las Vegas is the great exception–a bizarre, completely unrepresentative aberration thankfully isolated in the middle of the Mojave Desert.

And there is plenty of truth to the perception, crystallized in the fantastical, now mostly frozen construction site of the Strip skyline.

And yet, as my group at the Metropolitan Policy Program at the Brookings Institution launches an initiative to deepen our research in the Mountain West, I find myself thinking less about the ways Las Vegas is strange and more about how it is representative, even emblematic of America’s current predicament.

After all, Las Vegas’ gargantuan problems and its necessary way forward mirror and take to an extreme those of our troubled nation as a whole.

Southern Nevada, for starters, may well stand at ground zero of a national economic crisis made massive by speculation, financial game-playing, and insufficient attention to the fundamentals. No large U.S. metro area has suffered house price declines greater than Las Vegas’ 24 percent slump in the last year. No large metro has a higher concentration of home foreclosures. Gross metropolitan product has declined by 3 percent since its last peak in early 2007. And unemployment now exceeds 13 percent.

In this respect, Vegas exemplifies and exaggerates America’s economic quandary.

Most notably, growing consensus believes the nation needs to export more goods and professional services, and trade less on consumerism. As Larry Summers, the director of the National Economic Council, said recently, “The rebuilt American economy must be more export-oriented and less consumption oriented.”

Yet this is potentially disastrous for Las Vegas–just as it is challenging for the nation–because the Crystal City is massively over-dependent on consumption. Using one group of indicators, for example, we calculate that Las Vegas depends on consumption activities (real estate, construction, eating, drinking, and hospitality) for an astonishing 53 percent of its private-sector metropolitan GDP.

Only southern Nevada is not alone in its dependency: Orlando relies on consumption for 46 percent of its output, San Diego for 38 percent, Phoenix 34 percent, and so on, with the metropolitan average running to about 27 percent.

That hints how Las Vegas represents only a heightened case of the nation’s broader vulnerability to any long-term increase in the savings rate and consumption pull-back. It also points to the immense challenge the nation faces in returning to a semblance of balance and economic sanity, including through goods exports.

Or to put it another way, Las Vegas epitomizes to a heightened degree many of the questions facing the whole nation. Where will the next period of growth come from? How can we build a more sustainable new economic order? How will we use the bad times to change and get better?

As to the answers to those questions, the potential outlines are slowly coming into view, but they will be hard to fill in, whether nationally or in Las Vegas.

Much is fluid, but it seems pretty clear now that the next economy must require reforms and new investments in infrastructure, innovation (especially in energy), education, and sustainability. Nationally, a major new partnership between Washington and U.S. metros is necessary to make the most of America’s place in it.

And here again, Las Vegas offers a relevant instance. Too little work aimed at science, technology, and energy innovation is going on. The region contend with seriously low education levels and major water sustainability and development challenges. And its potential as a convening hub for major conferences and professional services development is undermined by its woefully deficient highway, rail ands transmission grids to move people in and out efficiently.

Yet for all that, the region is groping its way forward, motivated by a degree of fear.

Key leaders are pushing hard for a high speed rail link to Los Angeles and talking up a true interstate link to Phoenix.

Talk continues about ways to move the region’s convention and visitors economy up the value chain to make the place a true center of higher-value convening and deal-making, with a focus on renewable energy deployment.

And beyond that, few metros have made more striking efforts to go green. Per capita water consumption is plunging. The huge CityCenter project on the Strip will open soon as the world’s largest green development project. And no state has shifted faster and farther toward renewable energy than Nevada.

In short, bizarre, heedless, and extreme Las Vegas is not solely deviant but also paradigmatic. Like the rest of America, it went too far, and broke down, and now faces the challenge of the “reset” with the beginnings of a new approach. But it had better use these bad times well.


Mark Muro is a fellow at the Brookings Institution and the policy director of the Metropolitan Policy Program there. He is also a research director of the new Brookings Mountain West initiative. He can be reached at mmuro@brookings.edu.

Citiwire.net columns are not copyrighted and may be reproduced in print or electronically; please show authorship, credit Citiwire.net and send an electronic copy of usage to webmaster@citiwire.net.

7 Comments

  1. 1
    Ralph Craft
    Posted October 23, 2009 at 1:35 pm | Permalink

    Las Vegas might be better positioned for exports and growth than you think. Tourism from other nations is a major US export, and with the current (and future) decline in the dollar cities like Las Vegas and Orlando become cheaper for foreigners to visit.

  2. 2
    David Fuller
    Posted October 23, 2009 at 2:09 pm | Permalink

    I have a different take on Las Vegas as a consuming economy, although I admit to knowing very little about LV. My personal resolution of the paradox during this crisis–in which we are encouraged to spend to reawaken the economy while at the same time reduce our overspending/overconsumption–within a hostile environment–where making, using, and throwing away things threatens the climate. It would seem Americans could be encouraged to “consume” the good life (experiences that include eating out, partaking of entertainment, and traveling) rather than things. In this sense, LV (and presumably other places more conducive to a truly good life) could maintain some version of its economy.

  3. 3
    Posted October 23, 2009 at 2:56 pm | Permalink

    You said: “Much is fluid, but it seems pretty clear now that the next economy must require reforms and new investments in infrastructure, innovation (especially in energy), education, and sustainability. Nationally, a major new partnership between Washington and U.S. metros is necessary to make the most of America’s place in it”.
    I wonder why you didn’t mention transportation. We are spending huge amount of money on urban rail systems that carry very few people in relation to the total daily travel in a metro area. There are many reasons for this but one of the main ones is: you can’t get there from here on MASS TRANSIT – out cities are too spread out and will be for a very long time. Our most pressing transport problems are within our urban regions. Yet, we see calls for intercity, high speed rail and Obama is giving them his unquestioned support. What a waste of money and they will do little to deal with intra-urban transport problems where the need is very great. There are lots of better ways to provide high levels of mobility, with far fewer negative effects, in our urban areas and they are described at : http://faculty.washington.edu/jbs/itrans

  4. 4
    Nathan Landau
    Posted October 23, 2009 at 3:32 pm | Permalink

    How can there be a “green” development site in Las Vegas, a city with minimal mass transit and which has the highest rate of per capita water consumption in the country, despite its reliance on rapidly dwindling desert aquifers? Las Vegas seems to have taken point position in an increasingly important American “industry”–greenwashing.

  5. 5
    Neal Peirce
    Posted October 23, 2009 at 3:39 pm | Permalink

    Reader Schneider (second above) would do well to check Tom Downs’ eloquent Citiwire column on where we put out investments in America– a point relevant both to major rail and local rail systems. Here’s the link:
    http://citiwire.net/post/1391/

  6. 6
    charles torrence
    Posted October 23, 2009 at 4:29 pm | Permalink

    Las Vegas has no alternative but to reduce water consumption: look at the level of Lake Mead, then look at the ridiculous waste of water at the Lake Las Vegas project and other master planned communities in the region.

  7. 7
    Posted October 23, 2009 at 7:42 pm | Permalink

    In looking at Las Vegas’ multiple dilemmas (resources, foreclosures, economy) I’m struck by what may be a coincidence, but I suspect it isn’t. A recent Wall St. Journal article (Oct. 21 or 22?), which mentioned Las Vegas as the leading foreclosure city in the U.S., then mentioned the cities with comparatively small foreclosure problems: Portland, Seattle, Denver, Boston, Raleigh. Hmmm. Don’t those cities also top the “Where Young People Want To Live” lists? Are those two things – low foreclosures, high attraction for young creatives – related? Does one cause the other? Which would be the cause, which the effect?

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *. All comments are moderated before they appear; your comment will not appear immediately and will only be accepted if you provide your full name (contact Neal Peirce first if you believe your comment requires anonymity).

*
*