<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Detecting the Green Light: Local Chambers Ahead of Washington</title>
	<atom:link href="http://citiwire.net/post/1448/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://citiwire.net/post/1448/</link>
	<description>Leaving behind the 20th century pattern of cheap energy, endless automobility, burgeoning suburbs, threatened inner cities. To a challenge-packed 21st century: energy prices headed north, perilous carbon emissions, deepening have-have not divisions. But a time of exciting promise, too.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 02:47:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David James</title>
		<link>http://citiwire.net/post/1448/comment-page-1/#comment-1047</link>
		<dc:creator>David James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 20:07:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citiwire.net/?p=1448#comment-1047</guid>
		<description>If standing up to a federal government that wants to raise taxes and hassle business make you an obsessive ideologue and old bull, then put me out in that pasture as well.  The obsessive ideologues are the ones who would want the chamber to favor cap and tax which would greatly harm business.  It is especially egregious when a public utility takes a stand like that.    Keep it up Mr. Donahue, 99% of us are with you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If standing up to a federal government that wants to raise taxes and hassle business make you an obsessive ideologue and old bull, then put me out in that pasture as well.  The obsessive ideologues are the ones who would want the chamber to favor cap and tax which would greatly harm business.  It is especially egregious when a public utility takes a stand like that.    Keep it up Mr. Donahue, 99% of us are with you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Vaughan</title>
		<link>http://citiwire.net/post/1448/comment-page-1/#comment-941</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Vaughan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 13:28:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citiwire.net/?p=1448#comment-941</guid>
		<description>Neal--
Thanks for focusing on the good work of local chambers and for highlighting our &quot;First Green Chamber Building in America.&quot;

When our Greater Waco Chamber set out to build a green building, “LEED” wasn’t a common term around Waco. Few were thinking about green roofs, wood from sustainably managed forests, recycling construction waste, low-VOC paints and solvents and harvesting rainwater. 

By October 2009, however, at least a dozen high efficiency green buildings have been completed or are under construction in Waco, and the Chamber’s Green Business Network is generating support for more green buildings and more sustainable business practices. 

The “first green Chamber building in America” has definitely put Waco on the map. But more important is the fact that our building represents the kind of change in design and construction that with other non-transportation initiatives could reduce the nation’s energy consumption by 23 percent by 2020, save the U.S. economy $1.2 billion and reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 1.1 gigatons annually, according to a study by McKinsey &amp; Company.

The Chamber appreciates the support of its member-investors for making this building possible and for funding the nationally award-wining Challenge Greater Waco Program for Economic and Community Development.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neal&#8211;<br />
Thanks for focusing on the good work of local chambers and for highlighting our &#8220;First Green Chamber Building in America.&#8221;</p>
<p>When our Greater Waco Chamber set out to build a green building, “LEED” wasn’t a common term around Waco. Few were thinking about green roofs, wood from sustainably managed forests, recycling construction waste, low-VOC paints and solvents and harvesting rainwater. </p>
<p>By October 2009, however, at least a dozen high efficiency green buildings have been completed or are under construction in Waco, and the Chamber’s Green Business Network is generating support for more green buildings and more sustainable business practices. </p>
<p>The “first green Chamber building in America” has definitely put Waco on the map. But more important is the fact that our building represents the kind of change in design and construction that with other non-transportation initiatives could reduce the nation’s energy consumption by 23 percent by 2020, save the U.S. economy $1.2 billion and reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 1.1 gigatons annually, according to a study by McKinsey &amp; Company.</p>
<p>The Chamber appreciates the support of its member-investors for making this building possible and for funding the nationally award-wining Challenge Greater Waco Program for Economic and Community Development.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neal Peirce</title>
		<link>http://citiwire.net/post/1448/comment-page-1/#comment-926</link>
		<dc:creator>Neal Peirce</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 17:30:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citiwire.net/?p=1448#comment-926</guid>
		<description>Message from Ron Kilcoyne, General Manager/CEO,
Greater Bridgeport Transit Authority

I chair the Bridgeport Chamber of Commerce - an affiliate of the Bridgeport Regional Business Council (BRBC) and the also co-chair the land use and transportation working group of the Sustainability Plan. Our goals are to reduce VMT and remove the barriers to redeveloping the 15 to 20% of previously developed property in Bridgeport that is currently sitting dormant. All of this potential redevelopment is currently served by transit, and reducing VMT is not just essential for the Mayors goal to be carbon neutral but also because there are no plans to increase road capacity; so the additional trips generated by new development will have to be accommodated by non auto modes. We are crafting a transit first policy which will include a funding mechanism to increase frequency of bus services (despite serving a lot of vacant property, we have a systemwide average of 30 customers per revenue vehicle hour, not high by Manhattan standards but good for a community our size with no major university or heavy high school student use of city buses). We are also looking at establishing a mobility authority for the center city instead of a parking authority (as was recommended in the Downtown Master Plan) that will be as much about reducing the demand for parking as it is managing parking supply.

I also want to take this moment to state how much I enjoy your columns. I looked forward to reading your columns back in the 80&quot;s when I lived in the Bay Area and the San Francisco Examiner carried you column. When it stopped I complained to the op-ed editor who blamed your syndicator for the drop. When I moved to Connecticut in 2004 I was happy to see the New Haven Register carried your column about half the time. Then when I discovered I could receive all of them by e-mail a couple of years ago - nirvana. Then you added the guest columns and nirvana X 2.  Keep up the good work  - I only wish you had a larger audience. I do what I can to spread the word.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Message from Ron Kilcoyne, General Manager/CEO,<br />
Greater Bridgeport Transit Authority</p>
<p>I chair the Bridgeport Chamber of Commerce &#8211; an affiliate of the Bridgeport Regional Business Council (BRBC) and the also co-chair the land use and transportation working group of the Sustainability Plan. Our goals are to reduce VMT and remove the barriers to redeveloping the 15 to 20% of previously developed property in Bridgeport that is currently sitting dormant. All of this potential redevelopment is currently served by transit, and reducing VMT is not just essential for the Mayors goal to be carbon neutral but also because there are no plans to increase road capacity; so the additional trips generated by new development will have to be accommodated by non auto modes. We are crafting a transit first policy which will include a funding mechanism to increase frequency of bus services (despite serving a lot of vacant property, we have a systemwide average of 30 customers per revenue vehicle hour, not high by Manhattan standards but good for a community our size with no major university or heavy high school student use of city buses). We are also looking at establishing a mobility authority for the center city instead of a parking authority (as was recommended in the Downtown Master Plan) that will be as much about reducing the demand for parking as it is managing parking supply.</p>
<p>I also want to take this moment to state how much I enjoy your columns. I looked forward to reading your columns back in the 80&#8243;s when I lived in the Bay Area and the San Francisco Examiner carried you column. When it stopped I complained to the op-ed editor who blamed your syndicator for the drop. When I moved to Connecticut in 2004 I was happy to see the New Haven Register carried your column about half the time. Then when I discovered I could receive all of them by e-mail a couple of years ago &#8211; nirvana. Then you added the guest columns and nirvana X 2.  Keep up the good work  &#8211; I only wish you had a larger audience. I do what I can to spread the word.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Justice</title>
		<link>http://citiwire.net/post/1448/comment-page-1/#comment-921</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Justice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 02:22:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citiwire.net/?p=1448#comment-921</guid>
		<description>Everything these cities are doing is great and more power to them.  However, I believe the best and brightest engineers need to do current and future energy balances for cities as they go forward. This will allow them to plan how much and what sort of energy is needed as we reduce our carbon emissions.  We must be as realistic as we can about what can be accomplished with conservation and what additional energy is needed  to improve our economy.   Cities are going to need a tremendous amount of new power that cannot be supplied by wind and solar.  We need to be planning for this in the future. We can&#039;t assume that cities like LA and Houston can operate without new electrical power to operate their electric cars until their mass transit systems are built that will run off the new power.   Plus from what I read we are going to need 200 new nuclear power plants over the next 50 years.  It is doable but we need to get on with it and the cities are to be leaders in this area.
Robert Justice</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everything these cities are doing is great and more power to them.  However, I believe the best and brightest engineers need to do current and future energy balances for cities as they go forward. This will allow them to plan how much and what sort of energy is needed as we reduce our carbon emissions.  We must be as realistic as we can about what can be accomplished with conservation and what additional energy is needed  to improve our economy.   Cities are going to need a tremendous amount of new power that cannot be supplied by wind and solar.  We need to be planning for this in the future. We can&#8217;t assume that cities like LA and Houston can operate without new electrical power to operate their electric cars until their mass transit systems are built that will run off the new power.   Plus from what I read we are going to need 200 new nuclear power plants over the next 50 years.  It is doable but we need to get on with it and the cities are to be leaders in this area.<br />
Robert Justice</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conrad Wagner</title>
		<link>http://citiwire.net/post/1448/comment-page-1/#comment-919</link>
		<dc:creator>Conrad Wagner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 20:24:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citiwire.net/?p=1448#comment-919</guid>
		<description>In Switzerland the Green Party has initiated a nationwide campaign on &#039;Green New Deal&#039; since the ideas of Green Economy have established ... in our Canton Nidwalden the Green Party focuses on Energy Policy, Traffic/Mobility/Access, livable communities and smart growth ... in relation to this Green New Deal there&#039;s a great agreement of understanding: think global, act local ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Switzerland the Green Party has initiated a nationwide campaign on &#8216;Green New Deal&#8217; since the ideas of Green Economy have established &#8230; in our Canton Nidwalden the Green Party focuses on Energy Policy, Traffic/Mobility/Access, livable communities and smart growth &#8230; in relation to this Green New Deal there&#8217;s a great agreement of understanding: think global, act local &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: V.N. Pete Jorgensen</title>
		<link>http://citiwire.net/post/1448/comment-page-1/#comment-917</link>
		<dc:creator>V.N. Pete Jorgensen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 15:17:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citiwire.net/?p=1448#comment-917</guid>
		<description>Michigan&#039;s green legislation for inner cities restricts tax assessors from increasing taxes when private citizens rehab old houses. MCL (Michigan Compiled Law) 211.27 of 1893 was amended as; The Mathieu-Gast Home Improvement Act of 1976 (1976PA 293). Saint Joseph, MI is a model of neighborhood revitalization today with the results being a Jack Nicklaus Signature Golf Community being completed on the shores of Lake Michigan even in this economic climate because the developers see the long term benefits of that legislation 35 years ago. The EPA has funded the cleanup costs of several former foundry sites providing much of the land. The law is posted on my website under, why buy in Michigan?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michigan&#8217;s green legislation for inner cities restricts tax assessors from increasing taxes when private citizens rehab old houses. MCL (Michigan Compiled Law) 211.27 of 1893 was amended as; The Mathieu-Gast Home Improvement Act of 1976 (1976PA 293). Saint Joseph, MI is a model of neighborhood revitalization today with the results being a Jack Nicklaus Signature Golf Community being completed on the shores of Lake Michigan even in this economic climate because the developers see the long term benefits of that legislation 35 years ago. The EPA has funded the cleanup costs of several former foundry sites providing much of the land. The law is posted on my website under, why buy in Michigan?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john norquist</title>
		<link>http://citiwire.net/post/1448/comment-page-1/#comment-916</link>
		<dc:creator>john norquist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 02:11:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citiwire.net/?p=1448#comment-916</guid>
		<description>Great column Neal. Improving energy efficiency increases productivity and business profitability. Tom Donohue, the executive director of the US Chamber, seems obsessed with fighting ideological culture wars instead of representing the creative entrepreneurs in his membership. Donohue is an old bull who is stuck hopelessly in the past. The US Chamber should follow the example of groups like the Realtors or corporations like IBM that see energy efficiency as a positive for the economy. Advice to the Chamber- Fire Donohue before he drags you down any further.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great column Neal. Improving energy efficiency increases productivity and business profitability. Tom Donohue, the executive director of the US Chamber, seems obsessed with fighting ideological culture wars instead of representing the creative entrepreneurs in his membership. Donohue is an old bull who is stuck hopelessly in the past. The US Chamber should follow the example of groups like the Realtors or corporations like IBM that see energy efficiency as a positive for the economy. Advice to the Chamber- Fire Donohue before he drags you down any further.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
